First-Order Logic Theorem Proving and Model Building via Approximation and Instantiation

In this paper we consider first-order logic theorem proving and model building via approximation and instantiation. Given a clause set we propose its approximation into a simplified clause set where satisfiability is decidable. The approximation extends the signature and preserves unsatisfiability: if the simplified clause set is satisfiable in some model, so is the original clause set in the same model interpreted in the original signature. A refutation generated by a decision procedure on the simplified clause set can then either be lifted to a refutation in the original clause set, or it guides a refinement excluding the previously found unliftable refutation. This way the approach is refutationally complete. We do not step-wise lift refutations but conflicting cores, finite unsatisfiable clause sets representing at least one refutation. The approach is dual to many existing approaches in the literature because our approximation preserves unsatisfiability

SAT-Based Synthesis Methods for Safety Specs

Automatic synthesis of hardware components from declarative specifications is an ambitious endeavor in computer aided design. Existing synthesis algorithms are often implemented with Binary Decision Diagrams (BDDs), inheriting their scalability limitations. Instead of BDDs, we propose several new methods to synthesize finite-state systems from safety specifications using decision procedures for the satisfiability of quantified and unquantified Boolean formulas (SAT-, QBF- and EPR-solvers). The presented approaches are based on computational learning, templates, or reduction to first-order logic. We also present an efficient parallelization, and optimizations to utilize reachability information and incremental solving. Finally, we compare all methods in an extensive case study. Our new methods outperform BDDs and other existing work on some classes of benchmarks, and our parallelization achieves a super-linear speedup. This is an extended version of [5], featuring an additional appendix.Comment: Extended version of a paper at VMCAI'1

The Model Evolution Calculus with Equality

In many theorem proving applications, a proper treatment of equational theories or equality is mandatory. In this paper we show how to integrate a modern treatment of equality in the Model Evolution calculus (ME), a first-order version of the propositional DPLL procedure. The new calculus, MEE, is a proper extension of the ME calculus without equality. Like ME it maintains an explicit ``candidate model'', which is searched for by DPLL-style splitting. For equational reasoning MEE uses an adapted version of the ordered paramodulation inference rule, where equations used for paramodulation are drawn (only) from the candidate model. The calculus also features a generic, semantically justified simplification rule which covers many simplification techniques known from superposition-style theorem proving. Our main result is the refutational completeness of the MEE calculus

Polynomial-Time Amoeba Neighborhood Membership and Faster Localized Solving

We derive efficient algorithms for coarse approximation of algebraic hypersurfaces, useful for estimating the distance between an input polynomial zero set and a given query point. Our methods work best on sparse polynomials of high degree (in any number of variables) but are nevertheless completely general. The underlying ideas, which we take the time to describe in an elementary way, come from tropical geometry. We thus reduce a hard algebraic problem to high-precision linear optimization, proving new upper and lower complexity estimates along the way.Comment: 15 pages, 9 figures. Submitted to a conference proceeding

The Strategy Challenge in SMT Solving

Abstract. High-performance SMT solvers contain many tightly integrated, hand-crafted heuristic combinations of algorithmic proof methods. While these heuristic combinations tend to be highly tuned for known classes of problems, they may easily perform badly on classes of problems not anticipated by solver developers. This issue is becoming increasingly pressing as SMT solvers begin to gain the attention of practitioners in diverse areas of science and engineering. We present a challenge to the SMT community: to develop methods through which users can exert strategic control over core heuristic aspects of SMT solvers. We present evidence that the adaptation of ideas of strategy prevalent both within the Argonne and LCF theorem proving paradigms can go a long way towards realizing this goal. Prologue. Bill McCune, Kindness and Strategy, by Grant Passmore I would like to tell a short story about Bill, of how I met him, and one way his work and kindness impacted my life

System Description: GrAnDe 1.0

The validity problem for full first-order logic is... This paper describes the latest incarnation of our system, GrAnDe 1.0 (short for Ground And Decide). GrAnDe has two principal components: the grounding procedure eground [Sch02] and the propositional prover ZChaff [MMZ+01]. ZChaff was chosen from a field of powerful and mature propositional systems [HS01]..

Special cases and substitutes for rigid E-unification

The simultaneous rigid E-unification problem arises naturally in theorem proving with equality. This problem has recently been shown to be undecidable. This raises the question whether simultaneous rigid E-unification can usefully be applied to equality theorem proving. We give some evidence in the affirmative, by presenting a number of common special cases in which a decidable version of this problem suffices for theorem proving with equality. We also present some general decidable methods of a rigid nature that can be used for equality theorem proving and discuss their complexity. Finally we give a new proof of undecidability of simultaneous rigid E-unification which is based on Post's Correspondence Problem, and has the interesting feature that all the positive equations used are ground equations (that is, contain no variables). (orig.)Available from TIB Hannover: RR 1912(95-2-010) / FIZ - Fachinformationszzentrum Karlsruhe / TIB - Technische InformationsbibliothekSIGLEDEGerman